Tags: stupidity, STUPIDITY STUPIDITY STUPIDITY
In her stupid lying book, Joan Wheeler reports that my pet Brandy was a cat. WRONG. She was a DOG. – get your stupid facts straight when you write a “true” book. ha ha ha
this is me and my DOG – Brandy.
and this is her DOG license:
See Spot run. No – that’s Brandy, not Spot. See Joan confused. See Fluffy the cat? No, no cat. Dog.
Can you spell the word dog? – all together now: D O G –
Can you spell the word cat? – alltogher now: C A T –
Can you read the above document from the City of Buffalo? – Can you find right on the top of the document that says DOG LICENSE? You can? Very good. And what is the name of the breed of the dog listed on the document? – Alaskan Malamute. Do you know what that means class? An Alaskan Malamute is similar to the breed Siberian Husky. The Alaskan Malamute is larger and heavier than a Husky. Huskies go up to about 45 pounds. Brandy was 65 pounds.
Now class – American Domestic cats generally are about 9 – 12 pounds. Very much smaller than a 65 pound Alaskan Malamute pure bred DOG. In 1993 when I got Brandy the DOG, my husband and I had three cats: Samantha, PeeWee and Muffy. In 1992, I had put my other cat Francoise down. Joan reports in her book that in 1993 I had two cats named Brandy and Francoise.
The picture of me and my pet DOG Brandy shows that she is of the CANINE species.
Cats are FELINES.
There is a difference. Would someone please explain that to Joan? ruff ruff – want a MilkBone?
Now here is a scan of Brandy the DOG’S vet bill:
Well, class – what can we see from this document. That the animal’s name is Brandy – and what type of animal does the vet indicate this is? Why yes – it is DOG – and greater than 40 pounds! Wow! It does not say CAT anywhere – so where does Joan in her moronic mind figure out that Brandy is of the feline persuasion is beyond me. And I feel sorry for the Buffalo Police Department when a top-notch detective is also calling Brandy a cat and is reporting the wrong name on my telephone bill. –
Or could it have been Joan writing in her book falsehoods – and putting words in the detective’s mouth? Considering how the book is full of falsehoods and whole conversations stuffed into MY mouth when I never said them – I would say that that is what is going on. So take your pick Joan – either you’re a liar – or you really are that stupid that you can’t tell the difference between a cat and a dog. Either way you answer the question – you’re on the hot seat – and I can tell which way Joan will answer – she will ignore it. She refuses to answer anything that we have the proof for. She keeps hoping that we will go away and shut up so that we can shut our blogs down and take away the proof that she lied in her book. This is why she won’t answer our specific questions. Like a true little brat, she will hide under her bedcovers – trying to get away from the boogie-man in her life – our exposing blogs. And to further put the pressure on us – she dreams up a knight in shining armor – someone called Brian/Pilgrim/Champ. Ah, but Champ’s armor does not shine – it is rusted and dented with the lies and crap from Joan the Moron. Childhood is over Joni – you’re playing with the big girls now.
1. Ruth –
Joan will probably say (with a whine) “Well, I don’t know – how am I’m supposed to know what goes on in Ruth’s house.”
PRECISELY! Joan writes about speculations. But in this instance, she was writing in her book about an incident about annoyance phone calls with a police detective. She quotes the detective as saying, “Who is Brandy Sippel?” And Joan says “She’s her cat.” And the detective says, “well she’s got her phone number in Brandy’s name.” Then Joan says “She’s probably got her other cat Francoise paying the gas bill.”
BUT in a letter Joan wrote to my niece Karen, she admits to knowing that my phone bill was under the name of BRITTANY Sippel. Which I did to keep people from finding out my phone number. So if she knew it was in the name of BRITTANY, and not BRANDY, why did she put a different name in the book? OH – she was trying to protect my identity – sure – I believe that one – NOT!
But here – she has the detective saying that I’ve got the phone in my CAT’S name – she didn’t say DOG! – So her assertions that her book is truthful are nothing but lies in themselves.
Let this be a lesson to those who are trying to write a tell-all book – GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT – because if you don’t – you’re gonna end up looking like Joan is right now – a moron.
looking for some great info on Joan Wheeler April 26, 2012Posted by gertmcqueen in Uncategorized.
come on over to Gert’s blog
April 26, 2012
Joan Wheeler has multiple personalities or she has some fool that has no voice of their own and can only speak the same language as Joan who tells them what to say and how to say it!
an observation by Donald Duck, and I gotta say, I agree with him. I have to stop saying it to. April 25, 2012Posted by Ruth in Announcements and updates.
- 1. gertmcqueen –
If it looks like a duck and walks/quack/flies etc. like a duck, it is a duck. (humorous)
used to say that something is probably exactly what it seems to be and we should trust our judgment about it
The term generally applies to situations that may have been presented as one thing but are actually something else. It can also apply to situations that are self-evident or obvious to anyone.
- Ruth –
- Gert says: “It can also apply to situations that are self-evident or obvious to anyone.”
I would add to that – obvious to any or every one.”
And as Forrest Gump said: “Stupid is as stupid does.”
And my goodness, stupid really came out yesterday!! – does she want another MilkBone?
Joan Wheeler is at it again, browbeating an adoptive mother (the actress Edie Falco) using a FACEBOOK account! – new post by Gert McQueen on her blog! April 18, 2012Posted by Ruth in Announcements and updates, mental illness.
Tags: abuse, Adult Adoptees Advocating for Change forum, being downright nasty, death threats, Disrespect, Edie Falco, emotional abuse, harassment, hate speech, Joan Wheeler, menacing, mental instability, sick disgusting statements, stupidity, threatening, wishing harm on someone, wishing harm to someone
you guys really need to check this out!
and not only does Joan show us for the HYPOCRITE that she is – another sicko adoptee from the Adult Adoptees Advocating for Change forum shows what a sick brain she has – she says someone should soak a sock in gasoline, stuff it in Edie Falco’s mouth and set it on fire! – what the hell is wrong with these people? They need to be locked up!
Joan Wheeler needs to stop spreading the same old gossip and lies her adoptive mother filled her head up with. April 16, 2012Posted by Ruth in Joan Wheeler Speak - how Joan views the world, Joan Wheeler's abuse and harassment of her birth family, Refuting Joan Wheelers statements.
Tags: abuse, being downright nasty, blaming people for your own mess, contradictions, dishonesty, Disrespect, embellishing the truth, false accusations, gossip, harassment of an adoptee's birth family, impetigo, Lies, passing assumptions off as truth, Refuting Joan Wheelers statements, spreading untruths
On Sunday, April 15, 2012, on the Adult Adoptees Advocating for Change forum, Joan writes this following comment:
Re: Race, Religion, and Rescue in Adoption: Conference, NYC, October 2012
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 04:47:03 PM »
My adoptive mother always rescued orphans — baby birds, baby rabbits, puppies, kittens — she was raised in an orphange. It made her feel good to take in “strays”. And, no doubt, she loved animals and the other children she helped raise. I was the only one adopted. Yeah, there was that certain outlook in our home. At one point, Mom threw it in my face that “When we got you, you had sores all over your body!” And she said it with such sarcastic, rub it in your face kinda tone. Alright, I was an infant of 4 months, was that MY fault? Did that mean they rescued me?
On March 25, 2010, I blogged about this crap in my post “Joan tells a vicious lie about her own godparents on page 319 of Forbidden Family” Here is an excerpt of that post:
On page 319, Joan writes: “I also suffered through inconsistency of primary care as my mother lay dying in a hospital room. When I was released from the hospital my godparents took me in. As my adoptive mother told me, when I was four months old my father handed me over to them in family court. They took me home and were shocked to find body sores. My godparents, I was told by my adoptive mother, didn’t take good hygienic care of me in the few weeks they had me. My new parents nursed me back to health and made me feel guilty for it years later. “You had sores all over your body when we got you!” Mom yelled at me. I never understood why she yelled at me as I grew up. She made me feel as if it were my fault. Perhaps I should feel grateful that I was saved.”
On Friday, March 19, 2010, at 8pm, I spoke on the phone with my uncle, who was Joan’s godfather and who took care of her while my mother was in the hospital. My uncle says that Joan had impetigo, and she had them when she was discharged from the hospital. He told me his wife did everything she could to clear up the rash, and was just getting a hold of it, when my father came for Joan and gave her to the Wheelers. My uncle said, “Ann raised 4 children and did the best job. She took good care of Joan.” My uncle was outraged to hear this lie about him and his late wife. He also told me he had already fired off an email to Joan to “straighten her out.”
So once again, we see how Joan takes something that was told to her and instead of researching it, repeats the lie. She has had many opportunities in the past to ask our uncle if this story was true. But then again, could we have trusted Joan to tell the truth? No, because we see again and again, that Joan interprets facts to support her conclusions about things, if not outright lying about things.
Joan does say in her book and on the internet that her adoptive mother told her this nonsense about her having “body sores.” But does she tell her readers the truth of this gossip mongering? Does she defend her birth-uncle? NO! But all over her book and on the internet, she’s admonishing both her birth and adoptive families for gossip mongering!
She may have said on page 319 of her book that it was her adoptive mother that told her this crap – but she doesn’t follow through with THE TRUTH! And leaves her readers thinking this was the truth – when it wasn’t! Readers of her both her book and this latest retelling of this gossip on the adoptee forum, will leave with the impression that my uncle and his wife didn’t take good care of Joan while she lived with her. This is poor writing at best, and at worst, leaves the reader believing a piece of trashy gossip. Nice going Joan, I though all over your book you don’t like gossip mongering. I thought your book was the truth.
By leaving that vital piece of information out, Joan’s book is NOT the truth – and the result? My uncle was livid when I told him what was in the book. And he wants nothing more to do with her. She was kicked off his facebook page, and just recently his daughter, who just hadn’t gotten around to it before, kicked Joan off her facebook page.
So I suppose I will get the blame there. Of course, as usual, Joan does or says something stupid, insults people and gets them mad at her. And as usual, Ruth will get the blame. Yes, yes, it was Ruth who told her uncle and cousin what was in the book, so I am guilty of reporting it. But am I guilty of writing that gossip in the first place? NO! But Joan, in her diseased mind, will NOT take responsibility for her own actions. She will stew about her uncle and cousin not wanting contact with her, and think to herself, “It’s Ruth’s fault. She told them.” Never mind that they can read English and find that shit out for themselves. Everything all boils down to being Ruth’s fault. Ruth does nothing – but it’s all her fault.
That adoptive mother of Joan’s was a sick individual – she talked trash about us – the birth family and Joan came away believing it. And if she “re-writes” her book and explains that she had impetigo from the hospital – she had better give me credit for it – because as of March 2010, it was ME who reported the truth, and my uncle will not have told her about it – because he wants nothing more to do with her. And if the re-write contains this truth – it will show that she was NOT forthcoming with the truth in the first edition – which means all her statements that her book is a truthful account — FALSE!
And Joan, on her web page, wants to impress people with her ‘not harming people’!!! What a laugh!! Joan doesn’t have a decent bone in her body. All she can do is repeat lies and negative impressions about people, in this case, the birth family. Apparently Joan never was taught that ‘if you don’t have a nice thing to say about someone…keep your mouth shut’.
The birth family’s exposing of Joan’s words and deeds is just that….EXPOSING…the hate, the anger, the negativity that Joan has for any one who opposes her view…she is a very dangerous, vile person. We will continue to point out all these hateful words from Joan’s mouth until she learns to speak with dignity and respect of the birth family.
this particular lie and the retelling of it, is not only disgusting but it proves that Joan has no regard for those, birth relatives, that took care of her. Joan ought to hang her head in shame.
if she has a beef with the adoptive mother, say so, but Joan needs to stop repeating hateful, lies about people that are blood relatives.
Joan Wheeler says her “truthful” book (Forbidden Family) is currently under revision. April 10, 2012Posted by Ruth in Announcements and updates, Contradictions of Joan Wheeler, Joan Wheeler Speak - how Joan views the world, Joan Wheeler's abuse and harassment of her birth family, Lies in the book Forbidden Family, Refuting Joan Wheelers statements.
Tags: abuse, contradictions, dishonesty, embellishing the truth, false accusations, LIBEL, Lies, Refuting Joan Wheelers statements, SLANDER, spreading untruths, stupidity
On Joan Wheeler’s facebook page dedicated to her lying book Forbidden Family, is this announcement:
“Just to let everyone know, my book is out of print. Currently under revision! Second edition will be out soon!”
Her book is out of print from Trafford Publications because of the many lies she told in it. When Gert and I read the book and found the many falsehoods in it, lies engineered to smear our characters, such as saying I have an arrest and criminal record, when I do not, (slander and libel), we contacted Trafford Publications.
When Trafford researched the many actual court documents that I sent them, that proved that Joan lied in her “truthful” book, and that Joan lied to Trafford when she signed a contract with them, saying she owned copyrights to “the work and all its content” (actual contract language from Trafford) – TRAFFORD PUBLICATION KILLED THE BOOK. IT IS NOT ONLY OUT OF PRINT FROM TRAFFORD, IT HAS BEEN PULLED FROM ANY PUBLICATION THROUGH TRAFFORD. – She DOES NOT own the copyright to MY photograph that she put on the back cover.
Joan still has on her facebook page a blurb that says the book can be purchased from Trafford – so that in itself is a lie.
Now let’s get to her new announcement. She says her book is “currently under revision.”
How can a TRUTHFUL book be under revision? If the second edition comes out, and it has been changed, that would negate the first edition – right? And that would make all her assertions that she did NOT lie in her book lies in themselves.
Since November 2009, when her book first came out, Joan Wheeler has been saying on the internet – that she did NOT lie in her book. Then there would be no need to revise it, because you cannot revise the truth – right?
So if the second edition comes out, and she changes events – then she will be guilty of LYING again.
But this is what Joan does best – LIE HER BUTT OFF AND REVISE THE TRUTH AND REALITY.
GOT NEWS FOR YOU JOAN – YOU CANNOT REVISE TRUTH AND REALITY.
And do you think that we will allow more lies told about us? Think again sweetie.
Ruth is quite right…the truth is the truth and one can not revise a book that bills itself as a true account! How stupid is Joan? A REWRITE would be a better term!
and I’ll save Joan lots of time and energy…here’s the rewrite
I was born, because I wasn’t aborted. My mother was sick and died while I stayed with relatives, then I was placed into adoption because my father had no way of caring for me. I did not belong to that birth family. I was adopted by two very sick people who obeyed the law by not telling me the truth about my birth family. They also told me many hateful stories about my birth family and my childhood was hell. I was found when I was 18 by my birth siblings, but I was too naive and stupid to handle things. I was a spoiled child and my adopted parents always hated me and my birth family. My reunion was not happy or productive because I always got in everyone’s face and business. I caused lots of trouble, and over time, every family member ended up hating me. I tried to exploit my elderly father and step-mother and when I continued to insult my birth father, he kicked me out. When he died, because I was not on his obit, I made my own! I wrote a lying hateful libeous book that was pulled by the publisher because I violated our contract. Now I’m trying to ‘rewrite’ my life story because I live in a living hell called ADOPTION and I must tell the entire world because my life is a reason why adoption is wrong. I will always exploit my birth family because I’m stupid and mentally ill and because I need to make lots of money on the backs of my birth family because I can’t work because I have had a life of hell because I’m an adoptee.
So there, is Joan’s rewrite of her truthful life story…go for it, honey…but while you are doing so…you ought to remember that there are whole families out there, called the Herrs and the Sippels that might like a piece of you…so go ahead and continue on, by all means, and give them all something to see! It isn’t just your birth sisters that are going to continue to expose your lies and hate but many many more people in the families.
TIME BRINGS ALL THINGS TO LIGHT….
yep – Gert speaks TRUTH in her comment.
but it doesn’t matter – whatever you call it – revision or rewrite – it means the same thing. If the first edition of Forbidden Familyis a truthful account of her life, as Joan has been insisting for the past two and a half years, or even as she tried to fudge the truth by saying the book was her “point of view” of her life and the lives of her birth family, – a rewrite or revision, would still negate that first edition.
You canNOT rewrite the truth! The truth is the truth. If Joan wrote the truth the first time – why is it necessary to REWRITE IT OR REVISE IT! or – did she change her point of view of her life? – yeah, that’s it – she’s gonna go that way -she’s gonna say “I’ve done some soul searching and I’ve come to the conclusion that I’ve interpreted some things wrong in the first edition of my book.”
But if she does that – she will show the world what we birth sisters have been saying all along – Joan Wheeler speaks with a forked tongue and will twist her words to suit whatever mood she is in or to what audience she is speaking to. And we have harvested her lies and misrepresentations and HATE RHETORIC that she has posted on the Adult Adoptee forum and other internet sites.
I told the forum members back in 2010 to copy and paste what Joan says – date it and save it. Because she changes what she says all the time. She contradicts herself alll the time. In one internet whine about us birth sisters, she starts out saying she is disabled, on social security disability because SHE CAN’T WORK. Then after trashing us, she’s concerned about her name showing up on google and scaring away prospective employers. um, didn’t she just say she CAN’T WORK? That’s just one example of how she says one thing and several sentances later, says the complete opposite.
Joan is a pathetic loser. No matter how many rewrites or revisions or editions she puts out via vanity publication houses the result will still be the same – it will be full of lies and it will get pulled from publication.